|
May 27, 2009
Indian
Employment Law: Fringe Benefit Tax Withdrawal Proposal To Boost
Employee Stock Options
India is right back on the track of its growth trajectory
(although it can be argued that it was never derailed). And the
government seems to be providing the thrust. Recent news
articles suggest that the Indian government is planning to
withdraw fringe benefits tax (“FBT”) that was
levied on several of the benefits extended by companies to the
employees. This proposal, if implemented, is likely to
significantly boost employee stock option plans and employee
share purchase schemes, and their variations, which were
significantly affected as a result of the levy of FBT.
Background
FBT was introduced in India by the Finance Act, 2005. This
regime was borrowed largely from a similar tax regime prevalent
in countries like New Zealand and Australia. FBT was extended to
employee stock options and similar arrangements pursuant to an
amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2007. As a result,
while the employees were not required to pay any tax at the time
of grant, vesting or exercise of stock options, the employer was
required to pay FBT at the rate of 34% upon exercise of the
options. To the extent FBT was attracted, the employer became
liable to pay tax on a presumptive basis, in four quarterly
installments spread over the financial year. Companies not
listed in India offering stock options to their employees were
required to appoint the services of merchant bankers in India to
provide a valuation report. The tax rate and the procedural
requirements made stock options unattractive and unpopular for
the employer, although the tax laws allowed the employer to
recover the FBT paid from its employees.
To make matters worse for multi-national companies (“MNCs”)
having subsidiaries in India, the Central Board of Direct Taxes
(“CBDT”) issued an explanatory circular
clarifying that FBT was payable in the event of a foreign parent
grant stock options to employees of its India subsidiary,
although there was no direct employer-employee relationship (a
pre-requisite for FBT), between the foreign parent and the
employees of the Indian subsidiary. The CBDT clarification
necessitated such MNCs to also appoint merchant bankers in India
to value their shares, irrespective of whether the MNCs were
listed on a foreign stock exchange.
Practical issues
Just like is some of the other countries, the introduction of
FBT and subsequent extension to stock options, faced severe
opposition and criticism in the country. Employers argued that
stock options cannot be put under the same basket as other
benefits provided by the companies to their employees. FBT on
stock options was considered a tax on a notional amount.
Further, if the employer recovered FBT from the employees at the
time of exercise, this resulted in a situation that the
employees had to pay the tax without receiving any cash payout
from the employer. From a practical perspective, this also led
to a situation that the employer was required to recover the FBT
in cases where the employee may have not longer been employed
with the company. Not to mention the difficulties in calculation
of FBT every time the employee chose to exercise the vested
options at varying dates.
Proposal
The proposal to remove FBT is likely to be a boon for various
companies in India especially in the current economic scenario
and the ongoing global financial crises. It is also likely to
throw open more alternatives for structuring compensation
packages. With respect to stock options, it will allow companies
to incentivise their employees for superior performance by
providing long term benefits. This proposal is likely to be of
significance especially for start-ups and small & medium
enterprises which may not have adequate capital in the short
term to attract and retain talent.
The new Government plans to present the Indian Budget in early
July which will be anticipated with great interest. Whether the
government indeed withdraws the FBT, especially for stock
options, and whether it reverts to the earlier taxation regime
for stock options, remains to be seen. Hopefully, the proposed
withdrawal of FBT does not remain just as an option for the
government!
Source of news report:
The Economic Times, Mumbai edition, May 27, 2009
-
Vikram Shroff
& Parul Jain You
can direct your queries or comments to the authors
|