NISHITH.TV
  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York

Locations

  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Content
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • NDA in the Media
  • Areas of Service
  • Research and Articles
  • Opportunities
  • Contact
  • NDACloud
  • Client Access
  • Member Access
  • Events and Calender
  • How we perform
  • Knowledge anywhere, anytime
  • See our recent deals
  • Up to date legal developments
  • Case studies in M&A

Research and Articles

HTMLPDF

  • Research at NDA
  • Research Papers
  • Research Articles
  • NDA Think Tanks
  • NDA Hotline
  • New Ali Gunjan
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

NDA-Hotline


  • Debt Funding in India Series
  • Private Equity Corner
  • The Startups Series
  • Court Corner
  • Investment Funds: Monthly Digest
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
  • Deal Destination
  • New Publication
  • M&A Interactive
  • Lit Corner
  • Private Debt Hotline
  • Food & Beverages Hotline
  • Companies Act Series
  • Gaming Law Wrap
  • Private Client Wrap
  • GIFT City Express
  • Regulatory Hotline
  • Capital Markets Hotline
  • Tax Hotline
  • Corpsec Hotline
  • Dispute Resolution Hotline
  • M&A Hotline
  • Pharma & Healthcare Update
  • Competition Law Hotline
  • HR Law Hotline
  • IP Hotline
  • Telecom Hotline
  • FEMA Hotline
  • Social Sector Hotline
  • iCe Hotline
  • SEZ Hotline
  • Media Hotline
  • Funds Hotline
  • Education Sector Hotline
  • International Trade Hotlines
  • Other Hotline
  • Real Estate Update
  • Realty Check
  • White Collar and Investigations Practice
  • Legal Update
  • IP Lab
  • Cross Examination
  • Technology & Tax Series
  • Technology Law Analysis
  • Yes, Governance Matters.
  • Financial Service Update
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

Tax Hotline

July 26, 2006

Withholding tax on payments made to non-residents for services rendered abroad

The Authority for Advance Rulings (“AAR”) in a recent ruling (AAR/671/2005) has held that there will be a withholding tax requirement on payments made to a non-resident agent, even if such payments are made outside India and the services are performed outside India, if the agent’s entitlement to the income has arisen in India.

As per section 5 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“ITA”) the income of a non-resident is taxable in India if it accrues or arises in India or if it is received in India. Income is said to have accrued or arisen in India if it arises directly or indirectly from or through any source of income in India. As per section 9 (1) ITA. The question in the instant case was whether the income earned by a non-resident for services performed outside India, could be considered to have been sourced in India.

In this case, an Indian resident involved in the organization of an exhibition in India, appointed a non-resident agent for the purpose of business promotion and solicitation abroad. Payments were to be made to the agent only when those foreign participants which the agent had solicited, attended the exhibition in India. These payments were made outside India. The AAR held that the non-resident agents would be taxable in India because their right to receive commission arose in India, when the exhibitors participated in the Indian exhibition.

Prior to this ruling the Central Board of Direct Taxes (“CBDT”) had issued circulars on the issue of taxation of income payable to non-residents. As per CBDT Circular No. 23 of 1969 payments to a non-resident, who acted as the agent of an Indian exporter, for services rendered outside India, are not liable to tax in India. Circular No. 786 of 2000 reiterated this position. However, the AAR, distinguished the two circulars and certain cases such as In re Ind Telesoft Pvt Ltd [267 ITR 725 (AAR)] and Airports Authority of India (140 Taxmann 147) from the present situation. It held that, as per the circulars and precedents cited, the payment made outside India to a non-resident were not related to activities taking place in India. In the instant case, the entitlement of the non-resident was dependant on an activity that was to take place in India i.e. the exhibition, on the cancellation of which the non-resident agent would not be entitled to his income. Therefore, the AAR held that the payments made to a non-resident would be taxable in India if the non-resident’s entitlement to income arises out of an event that takes place in India.

As per this ruling, places other than those where the service is rendered, may be the source of income. Services could therefore be rendered abroad and income from those services still be considered to have accrued or arisen in India if they are dependant on certain events which take place in India.

 

- Shreya Rao & Annapoorna Jayaseelan

 
 

Source: AAR/671/2005.

Mission and Vision


Distinctly Different

What's New


Credit Default Swap: Grooming the Infamous Device
Debt Funding in India Series: July 05,2022
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Decrees in India
New Publication : July 05,2022

Events


Webinars

Sustainable Mobility: Opportunities and Challenges
June 09,2022 - June 09,2022

This event is over. For event material please click here


Seminar

Navigating Disputes in India
February 26,2020 - February 26,2020

This event is over. For event material please click here


Round Table

Investing In Net Zero
July 14,2022 - July 14,2022

News Roundup


News Articles

Impact of Supreme Court’s new covidvaccination ruling on India’s employers
May 13,2022

Quotes

Are you a social media influencer or doctor? Here's how the new TDS rules will impact you
June 26,2022

Newsletters


Debt Funding in India Series

Credit Default Swap: Grooming the Infamous Device
July 05,2022

New Publication

Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Decrees in India
July 05,2022

Legal Update

RBI Master Direction on Variation Margin in NCCDs – Analysis
July 04,2022

  • Disclaimer
  • Content
  • Feedback
  • Walkthrough
  • Subscribe
Nishith Desai Associates@2016 All rights reserved.