NISHITH.TV
  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York

Locations

  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Content
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • NDA in the Media
  • Areas of Service
  • Research and Articles
  • Opportunities
  • Contact
  • NDACloud
  • Client Access
  • Member Access
  • Events and Calender
  • How we perform
  • Knowledge anywhere, anytime
  • See our recent deals
  • Up to date legal developments
  • Case studies in M&A

Research and Articles

HTMLPDF

  • Research at NDA
  • Research Papers
  • Research Articles
  • NDA Think Tanks
  • NDA Hotline
  • New Ali Gunjan
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

NDA-Hotline


  • Capital Markets Hotline
  • Companies Act Series
  • Climate Change Related Legal Issues
  • Competition Law Hotline
  • Corpsec Hotline
  • Court Corner
  • Cross Examination
  • Deal Destination
  • Debt Funding in India Series
  • Dispute Resolution Hotline
  • Education Sector Hotline
  • FEMA Hotline
  • Financial Service Update
  • Food & Beverages Hotline
  • Funds Hotline
  • Gaming Law Wrap
  • GIFT City Express
  • Green Hotline
  • HR Law Hotline
  • iCe Hotline
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
  • International Trade Hotlines
  • Investment Funds: Monthly Digest
  • IP Hotline
  • IP Lab
  • Legal Update
  • Lit Corner
  • M&A Disputes Series
  • M&A Hotline
  • M&A Interactive
  • Media Hotline
  • New Publication
  • Other Hotline
  • Pharma & Healthcare Update
  • Private Client Wrap
  • Private Debt Hotline
  • Private Equity Corner
  • Real Estate Update
  • Realty Check
  • Regulatory Digest
  • Regulatory Hotline
  • Renewable Corner
  • SEZ Hotline
  • Social Sector Hotline
  • Tax Hotline
  • Technology & Tax Series
  • Technology Law Analysis
  • Telecom Hotline
  • The Startups Series
  • White Collar and Investigations Practice
  • Yes, Governance Matters.
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

Tax Hotline

April 26, 2007

Mumbai Tribunal holds Arm’s Length Payment to Dependent Agent does not extinguish Liability of a Permanent Establishment

The Mumbai tax tribunal (“Tribunal”) has recently held in case of SET Satellite (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“SET”) that payment of arm’s length price to the dependent agent does not extinguish the tax liability of the foreign company in India. The Tribunal has endorsed the ‘dual entity approach’ and held that dependent agent Permanent Establishment (“PE”) is distinct from the dependent agent and both can be taxed separately in India. This means even though arm's length price is paid to a related entity in India by a foreign company, additional tax can be imposed on the foreign company’s revenues earned from India. This ruling is likely to increase tax uncertainties in India, thus increasing business risks for foreign companies doing business in India through a dependent agent.

The ruling comes in the middle of a raging controversy on attribution of income to a PE. Recently, the Authority for Advance Rulings had held in the case of Morgan Stanley that if the Indian company is paid an arm’s length price, no further attribution can be made to the PE in India. The tax office had appealed to the Supreme Court of India on this issue, and a ruling is expected shortly.

In this case, SET was a telecasting company tax resident in Singapore. SET had appointed an agent in India for marketing airtime slots and the agent constituted a dependent agent PE. SET argued that as it remunerated the Indian agent at an arm’s length price, nothing further would be attributable to it in India. In arriving at this position SET relied on Circular no. 23 of 1969 and Circular no. 5 of 2004 (which was a clarification on the taxation in case of outsourcing industry) issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

The Tribunal decided the case against SET holding that the ‘dependent agent’ and the ‘dependent agent PE’ were two different tax payers. The income earned from India by the dependent agent PE would be taxable in India and a deduction would be allowed for the payment made to the dependent agent.

In coming to this conclusion the Tribunal relied on the OECD Report on ‘Attribution of Profits to PE’, and the Australian Tax Office paper on the attribution of profits in case of dependent agent PE. In countering the argument that, as stated in the OECD Report a change in the language of the tax treaty currently in place between India and Singapore would be required in order for the report to be applied, the Tribunal held that the language of the treaty as it currently stands merits this interpretation.
The Tribunal thus seems to have departed from the single tax payer approach thus far followed in India, and adopted the dual tax payer approach advocated by the OECD. It remains to be seen which approach the Supreme Court of India will take with regard to the issue. This decision is likely to impact many foreign companies which are doing business in India through dependent agents.

 

-  Annapoorna Jayaseelan & Shefali Goradia

 
 

Source: ITA No. 205 and 535 / Mum / 04

Mission and Vision


Distinctly Different

What's New


Amity University Maharashtra Hosts its Convocation Ceremony at Mumbai Campus
Quotes: March 24,2023
India loosens restrictions on foreign lawyers
Quotes : March 23,2023

Events


Webinars

Sovereign Wealth Fund and Pension Funds investments in India: Unique Considerations and Critical Issues
March 09,2023 - March 09,2023

This event is over. For event material please click here


Seminar

Fund Structuring and Investments in 2023 - Luncheon and Knowledge Sessions
March 24,2023 - March 24,2023

This event is over. For event material please click here


Round Table

Investing In Net Zero
July 22,2022 - July 22,2022

This event is over. For event material please click here

News Roundup


News Articles

Shareholder Activism: An ESG tool or a Founder’s curse?
October 13,2022

Quotes

Amity University Maharashtra Hosts its Convocation Ceremony at Mumbai Campus
March 24,2023

Newsletters


Regulatory Hotline

Australia and India’s education Framework – What it means for stakeholders
March 20,2023

Regulatory Hotline

Intimation of Material Changes by Foreign Portfolio Investors: The Timeline Turbulence
March 17,2023

New Publication

Doing Business in India
March 16,2023

  • Disclaimer
  • Content
  • Feedback
  • Walkthrough
  • Subscribe
Nishith Desai Associates@2016 All rights reserved.