NISHITH.TV
  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York

Locations

  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Content
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • NDA in the Media
  • Areas of Service
  • Research and Articles
  • Opportunities
  • Contact
  • NDACloud
  • Client Access
  • Member Access
  • Events and Calender
  • How we perform
  • Knowledge anywhere, anytime
  • See our recent deals
  • Up to date legal developments
  • Case studies in M&A

Research and Articles

HTMLPDF

  • Research at NDA
  • Research Papers
  • Research Articles
  • NDA Think Tanks
  • NDA Hotline
  • New Ali Gunjan
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

NDA-Hotline


  • Capital Markets Hotline
  • Companies Act Series
  • Climate Change Related Legal Issues
  • Competition Law Hotline
  • Corpsec Hotline
  • Court Corner
  • Cross Examination
  • Deal Destination
  • Debt Funding in India Series
  • Dispute Resolution Hotline
  • Education Sector Hotline
  • FEMA Hotline
  • Financial Service Update
  • Food & Beverages Hotline
  • Funds Hotline
  • Gaming Law Wrap
  • GIFT City Express
  • Green Hotline
  • HR Law Hotline
  • iCe Hotline
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
  • International Trade Hotlines
  • Investment Funds: Monthly Digest
  • IP Hotline
  • IP Lab
  • Legal Update
  • Lit Corner
  • M&A Disputes Series
  • M&A Hotline
  • M&A Interactive
  • Media Hotline
  • New Publication
  • Other Hotline
  • Pharma & Healthcare Update
  • Private Client Wrap
  • Private Debt Hotline
  • Private Equity Corner
  • Real Estate Update
  • Realty Check
  • Regulatory Digest
  • Regulatory Hotline
  • Renewable Corner
  • SEZ Hotline
  • Social Sector Hotline
  • Tax Hotline
  • Technology & Tax Series
  • Technology Law Analysis
  • Telecom Hotline
  • The Startups Series
  • White Collar and Investigations Practice
  • Yes, Governance Matters.
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

Tax Hotline

August 23, 2001

Notification of applicable rules for transfer pricing in India

The Indian Government has notified the rules in relation to transfer pricing vide notification No.S.O.808 (E) dated 21.8.2001, inserting new rules 10A to 10E in the Income tax Rules, 1962 (“Rules”). These Rules prescribe the manner in which an arm’s length price in relation to an international transaction is to be determined by the “most appropriate method”, the factors to be considered in selecting the most appropriate method, and the information and the documents required to be maintained and furnished by the taxpayer.

There have been some significant changes to the draft transfer pricing rules, such as:

  1. The taxpayers have been allowed the use of multiple year data pertaining to comparable transactions in determining the arm’s length price.
  2. Taxpayers are free to select the most appropriate method as long as their selection is made taking into account the factors prescribed.
  3. Documentation requirements have been considerably scaled down to now require only such information as is relevant to the transactions entered into.
  4. Documentation requirements shall not be applicable in cases where the aggregate value of international transactions entered into during a year is upto Rs.10 million.


The Central Board of Direct Taxes also proposes to issue a circular shortly, clarifying the following:

  • The tax authorities shall not make any adjustments to the arm’s length price adopted by the taxpayer if such price is upto 5% less or 5% more than the price determined by the Assessing Officer.
  • No adverse view shall be taken by the tax authorities in case documentation requirements are not fulfilled in respect of transactions entered during the period commencing April 1, 2001 to August 31, 2001.
  • It is being made abundantly clear that the tax authorities can alter the pricing adopted by the taxpayer only in cases and circumstances specified in section 92C(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961, namely, where necessary documentation has not been maintained or furnished, or the methods prescribed for determining arm’s length prices have not been followed, or the data used by the taxpayer is not reliable or correct.
 
 

Source: August 23, 2001, Press Information Bureau

Mission and Vision


Distinctly Different

What's New


Foreign Higher Educational Institutions’ Route to India: Discussing UGC’s Draft Regulations
Video: January 27,2023
TMS Ep354: NSE colocation case, influencer regulation, markets, AT-1 bonds
Video : January 25,2023

Events


Webinars

Foreign Higher Educational Institutions' Route to India: Discussing UGC's Draft Regulations
January 27,2023 - January 27,2023

This event is over. For event material please click here


Seminar

Evolution of White collar crimes and Investigations
January 31,2023 - January 31,2023

Round Table

Investing In Net Zero
July 22,2022 - July 22,2022

This event is over. For event material please click here

News Roundup


News Articles

Shareholder Activism: An ESG tool or a Founder’s curse?
October 13,2022

Quotes

Air India employees penalised with pay-cut; hopes pinned on HCTold double the market rent will be deducted from salary until they vacate AI properties
January 11,2023

Newsletters


Funds Hotline

AIF participation in Credit Default Swaps
January 20,2023

Corpsec Hotline

SEBI's Comprehensive Framework on Offer for Sale Through Stock Exchanges
January 20,2023

Dispute Resolution Hotline

A New Composite Approach: Singapore Court of Appeal settles law for determining arbitrability of disputes
January 19,2023

  • Disclaimer
  • Content
  • Feedback
  • Walkthrough
  • Subscribe
Nishith Desai Associates@2016 All rights reserved.