|
September 22, 2008
‘Sounds’ good for Trademark Protection-Yahoo registers the first
ever sound trademark in India
India’s Trade mark Registry has ‘registered’ a new high by
extending trademark protection to a sound mark. On August 18,
2008, India’s first “sound mark” was granted to Sunnyvale,
California-based Internet firm Yahoo Inc.’s three-note Yahoo
yodel by the Delhi branch of the Trademark Registry1.
It was registered in classes 35, 38 and 42 for a series of goods
including email, advertising and business services and managing
websitesHot on the heels to this news is that Finnish mobile
phone maker Nokia has also applied for a sound mark for its
signature musical notation in the Mumbai branch of the Trade
Marks Registry and the case is being processed.
Can the sound mark scamper under the Trademark umbrella?
Analysis of the current Indian regime:
Under the Trademarks Act, 1999 (‘Act’) the term
‘marks’ is defined as “mark includes a device, brand, heading,
label, ticket, name, signature, word, letter, numeral, shape of
goods, packaging or, combination of colors, or any combination
thereof.” Thus, the list of instances of marks is inclusive and
not exhaustive. Any mark capable of being ‘graphically
represented’ and indicative of a trade connection with
the proprietor is entitled to get registered as a trademark
under the Act. This interpretation opens the scope of trademark
protection to unconventional trademarks like sound marks,
provided they satisfy the ‘graphical representation’ test and
are not prohibited under Section 9 and 11 of the Act. The Act or
the Rules framed thereunder do not contemplate submission of any
record of the sound mark. The only way the mark may be described
in the application for trademark is by way of ‘graphical
representation’.
Scope of ‘Graphical representation’:
Trademark Rules define “graphical representation” as
representation of a trademark for goods or services in paper
form2.
Sound marks can be represented on paper either in descriptive
form e.g. kukelekuuuuu(Dutch onomatopoeia which sounds like the
call of a cock) or as traditional musical notations e.g. D#, E
etc. In the case of Yahoo’s Yodel mark, they represented the
mark using musical notations3.
Syncing the Indian law to tide the hurdles
of registration:
Reducing a sensory mark to a written description on paper may
not be always possible. A “graphical description” sound mark
should clearly identify the exact sound, else the enforcement of
the same, would lead to practical issues. E.g. the search result
of the trademark at Trade Mark Registry, would not be accurate
if the mark is not appropriately described. Merely musical notes
without a listing of the note pattern would not provide enough
sensory information to contemplate the scope of protection on
the mark. With regard to onomatopoeia, there is lack of
consistency between the onomatopoeia itself, as pronounced, and
the actual sound or noise which it purports to imitate
phonetically.
The European Court of Justice has held that musical notations
alone are neither a clear nor precise description of the sound
mark and gives no information about the pitch and duration of
the sounds forming the melody. Even these form the essential
parameters for the purposes of defining the trade mark itself.
The graphical representations should be clear, precise,
self-contained, easily accessible, intelligible, durable and
objective. A stave divided into bars and showing, in particular,
a clef, musical notes and rests whose form indicates the
relative value and, where appropriate, accidentals (sharp, flat,
natural)-all of these determine the pitch and duration of the
sounds. This may constitute a faithful representation of the
sequence of sounds forming the melody in respect of which
registration is sought4.
Defining the boundaries of protection
accorded:
Indian Trademark Registry may have enhanced the scope of
protection under the trademark umbrella, but there need to be
clear guidelines for description, recording and protection that
will help define the boundaries of protection of sound marks.
Practical difficulties are bound to arise when trademark
searches will be required. For e.g. if the sound mark is a
crow’s call and is described as kukelekuuuuu, the same may be
spelt differently or represented with musical notations. The
procedure may be highly complicated as musical notations need to
be matched against alphabets. To simplify matters, a sample of
the sound may be submitted with the application. A separate
database of these sound marks can be created and rules for
determination of deceptive similarity between sound marks should
be developed.
Sound marks may be commonplace in US where Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer’s
mark of “a lion roaring” has long been registered for movies.
But with Yahoo in the kitty, Nokia in the pipeline, it won't be
far before other corporate giants like Britannia and Titan would
make a beeline to protect their signature tunes in India.
___________________________
|
|
|
You
can direct your queries or comments to the authors
|
|