Dispute Resolution Hotline
February 25, 2019
India—Bombay High Court refuses to grant anti-arbitration injunction (Ravi Arya v Palmview Overseas)

This article was originally published in the 23rd January 2019 edition of


SUMMARY:

In Ravi Arya v Palmview Overseas, the Bombay High Court ruled that when remedies are available to the party seeking an injunction under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an anti-arbitration injunction cannot be obtained to circumvent provisions of the Act. The present case raises a critical issue of appointment of a single arbitrator by multiple parties having a conflict of interest inter se.

 

For complete article, please click here.

 

– Bhavana SunderKshama A. Loya & Vyapak Desai

You can direct your queries or comments to the authors

 


Disclaimer

The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.

This Hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances. This Hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

This is not a Spam mail. You have received this mail because you have either requested for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a mail cannot be considered Spam if it contains the sender's contact information, which this mail does. In case this mail doesn't concern you, please unsubscribe from mailing list.


Dispute Resolution Hotline

February 25, 2019

India—Bombay High Court refuses to grant anti-arbitration injunction (Ravi Arya v Palmview Overseas)


This article was originally published in the 23rd January 2019 edition of


SUMMARY:

In Ravi Arya v Palmview Overseas, the Bombay High Court ruled that when remedies are available to the party seeking an injunction under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an anti-arbitration injunction cannot be obtained to circumvent provisions of the Act. The present case raises a critical issue of appointment of a single arbitrator by multiple parties having a conflict of interest inter se.

 

For complete article, please click here.

 

– Bhavana SunderKshama A. Loya & Vyapak Desai

You can direct your queries or comments to the authors

 


Disclaimer

The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.

This Hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances. This Hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

This is not a Spam mail. You have received this mail because you have either requested for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a mail cannot be considered Spam if it contains the sender's contact information, which this mail does. In case this mail doesn't concern you, please unsubscribe from mailing list.