INTRODUCTION

3 "Indian entertainment industry to touch $6.8 bn: study”, October 18, 2002.
4 "The Complete History of Bollywood": India Infoline Film Industry Sector Report, http://www.indiainfoline.com/sect/mefi/chQ2.html (As visited on April 1, 2002)
5 K. Moti Gokulsing and Wimal Dissanayake, “Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change”. Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books (1998)
6 David Chute, “The Road to Bollywood”, Film Comment, May/June 2002, p. 36.
7 The Indian Entertainment Industry: FRAMES, March 2001.
8 "Entertainment yearns to hear cash jingle, 'cut' in import duty" Economic Times, February 15,2002.
9 "Film Introduction", The Economic Times Entertainment 2001-2002, p. 64.
10 ibid.
11 2002: A lackluster year for Bollywood”, December 1, 2002
12 Supra no. 7
13 Maharashtra had 1113 theatres in 1999-2000: "Film Introductiori', The Economic Times Entertainment 2001-2002, p.65.
14 Supra no. 7
15 www.cinemaindiashow.com (As visited in January, 2003)
16 “Can new money create a world-class film industry in India?” http://www.businessweek.com/magazines/content/02_48/b3810013.htm.
17 Top 25 Earners of 2002 http://www.planetbollywood.com/BoxOffice/b3202-005350.php (As visited on January 18, 2003)
18 The average ticket rate in 1998 in India was US$0.2, whereas in Japan it was US$ 10.3. Source: Screen Digest, Human Development Report, 2000.
19 Don't call it Bollywood: www.cio.com (As visited in June 2001).
20 Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change. By K. Moti Gokulsing and Wimal Dissanayake. Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books (1998) and Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema. By A. Rajadhyaksha and P. Willemen. New Delhi: Oxford University Press (1994).
21 For example, "Taal": See Shah Amrita, "Bollywood goes global', Indian Express, North American Edition, April 20, 2000.
22 "Film-making calls for balancing creativity, marketing skills: Ghai", Times of India, July 28,2001
23 K3G can help Bollywood make inroads into US: critics", Times of India, January 11,2002
24 Top 50 Domestic Boxoffice. The Hollywood Reporter, August 13-19, 2002.
25 Supra no. 24
26 Supra no. 7
27 Ashoke Nag, “Bollywood film exports to rise 30% in '02-03”, Economic Times, July 26, 2002
28 World Advertising Trends, 2000, ETIG.
29 http://www.theguru-movie.com/ (As visited in January 2003)
30http://www.btopenworld.com/lifestyle/yourlifeinterests/film_entertainment/1,,csn=894,00.html (As visited in January 2003)
31 Deepali Nandwani, “Recession hampers Hindi film industry”, www.rediff.com/entertai/2002/jun/18film.htm
32 “Can new money create a world-class film industry in India?”, www. Businessweek.com
33 “Can new money create a world-class film industry in India?” http://www.businessweek.com/magazines/content/02_48/b3810013.htm. (As visited on January 8, 2003)
34 Former Disney creative executive
35 Tsering Lisa "Colors and Sounds of Bollywood Enlighten 'Moulin Rouge', India-West, May 31, 2001
36 Ashni Parekh, Deepali Fernandes, "Hollywood Bollywood Nexus", Siliconlndia, September 2001.
37 Nandini Raghavendra, “Why don't Indian films make it to mainstream markets”, Times News Network, March 31, 2002.

 

II MAKING OF A FILM: BOLLYWOOD VS. HOLLYWOOD

38 Financial Times, 13 August 1997, p. 6.
39 The ET Knowledge Series, Entertainment 2001-2002.
40 "Above-the-line" personnel, are those persons whose services are creatively unique and are individually identifiable such as the writer, the performers, the director, the producer, and the executive producer.
41 "Below-the-line" personnel may make creative contributions, but they are essentially concerned with the technical aspects of production. Such persons include the production manager, cinematographer, the set designer, the special effects person, the wardrobe person, and the makeup artist.
42 Matthew Bender, Entertainment Industry Contracts, Music (SamuelJ. Fox).
43 “Music firms launch anti-piracy campaign”, Times News Network, December 25, 2002.
44 Gurbir Singh, “Big film music deals play the swan song”, The Economic Times, July 4, 2002.
45 Kaajal Waalia, "Bookworm Bites Bollywood", Times of India, December 25,2001.
46 John Lippman, "Movie Production Costs Fell 13% in 2001 but Marketing Costs Rose". The Wall Street Journal, March 6, 2002.
47 John Lippman, "Movie Production Costs Fell 13% in 2001 but Marketing Costs Rose". The Wall Street Journal, March 6, 2002.
48 http://online.wsj.com/article/O..SB983918280741690665.djm.00.html. (As visited in June 2001).
49 http://www.cmr.com (As visited in January, 2003)
50 Lorenza Muñoz, “Little pictures have a big year” Los Angeles Times, January 3 2003
51 Supra no.40
52 Distribution: The Key to Success at www.moviemaker.com (As visited in June 2001).
53 This is usually done with a big budget feature that has the potential of grossing over $100 million with a $10-$15 million release cost. Distributors: Warner Bros., Paramount, MCA/Universal, Disney.
54 “Boxoffice 2002: Wider releases, slower growth” By Brian Fuson. The Hollywood Reporter, January 2, 2003.
55 “Studio spending: When to say enough?” By Stephen Galloway. The Hollywood Reporter, August 12, 2002.
56 Distributors: Miramax, New Line and MGM/UA.
57 Distributors: Regency, Polygram, Savoy and Gramercy.
58 Distributors: Samuel Goldwyn, Fox Searchlight, Trimark and Mandalay.
59 The Laemmie, Lumiere and Landmark are examples of these theater circuits. Thus, you need only 7-10 prints to get exposure and then, depending upon box-office acceptance, go on a small market-by-market campaign sometimes called a "roadshow". Distributors: Strand Releasing, Fine Line and Mandalay.
60 www.supnik.com (As visited on April 1, 2002).
61 James R. Jaeger II, "Matrixx Entertainment - New Distribution Paradigm."
62 “specialized" means films that played in fewer than 500 theaters in their first three weeks and fewer than 1,500 theaters in weeks four through six.
63 Lorenza Muñoz, “Little pictures have a big year” Los Angeles Times, January 3 2003
64 Lorenza Muñoz, “Little pictures have a big year” Los Angeles Times, January 3 2003
65 President of worldwide marketing and distribution for Sony.
66 http://www.rediff.com/entertai/2003/jan/03kaante.htm (As visited in January, 2003).

 

III. DISCERNING THE DIFFERENCES

67 AFMA is a non-profit association whose mission is to provide the independent film and television industry with high-quality market-oriented services and worldwide representation.
68 David Germain, "Hollywood 2002: Look out for blockbuster sequels", Times of India, January 2,2002.
69 Ibid.
70 “Bollywood: Metropolitan Masala” By Leslie Forbes. High Life. July 2002.
71 'Hits and Flops', Trade Guide, January 5,2002.
72 “2002: A lackluster year for Bollywood”, December 1, 2002.
73 Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change. By K. Moti Gokulsing and Wimal Dissanayake. Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books (1998).
74 “Playback time: A brief history of Bollywood film songs” By Nasreen Munni Kabir. Film Comment, May/June 2002.
75 Gurbir Singh, “Big film music deals play the swan song”, The Economic Times, July 4, 2002.
76 BOX OFFICE - Los Angeles Times By Lorenza Muñoz January 3 2003.
77 "Entertainment yearns to hear cash jingle, 'cut' in import duty" Economic Times, February 15, 2002.
78 Nag Ashok "Gujarat tremors hit Bollywood", Economic Times, February 18,2001.
79 Industry sources.
80 "The Film Industry in India": An IndiaOneStop synopsis: www.indiaonestop.com (As visited in June 2001).
81 John Lippman, "Movie Production Costs Fell 13% in 2001 but Marketing Costs Rose". The Wall Street Journal, March 6,2002.
82 http://www.quardian.co.uk/netnotes/article/0,6729,494840,00.html (As visited in June 2001).
83 http://www.rediff.com/entertai/2000/nov/08raju.htm (As visited in June 2001).
84 Amit Khanna, "Calling Bollywood :K3G set to become new benchmark", Economic Times, December 25,2001
85 Supra no. 32
86 Supra no. 75.
87 "The Film Industry in India": An IndiaOneStop synopsis: www.indiaonestop.com (As visited in June 2001)
88 'Hollywood v.Bollywood: abcnews.com.
89 “Can new money create a world-class film industry in India?”, www.Businessweek.com.
90 “Spider Man”, “Attack of the Clones”, “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets”, “Signs”, “My Big Fat Greek Wedding”, “The Lord of the Rings”, “The Two Towers”, and “Austin Powers in Goldmember”.
91 Brian Fuson, “Boxoffice posts record gains in a super year”, www.hollywoodreporter.com, Jan 6, 2003.
92
93 For e.g., if the production budget is US$3.5 million and US$2 million of the budget amount is already received from pre-sales, investor funds and other collateral, the remaining US$1.5 million is considered the "gap."
94 Zwick Steve, 'German production companies are pouring money in to big US movies with mixed results', www. Time.com.
95 Industry Sources.
96 “Indian Film Industry,” By D. Majumdar, in P. Maitra (Ed) 100 Years of Cinema. Calcutta, India: Nandan (1995).
97 “Big Finish: Boxoffice posts record gains in a super year” By Brian Fuson. The Hollywood Reporter, January 6, 2003.
98 “DVD home video's shining start in '02” The Hollywood Reporter, January 14-20, 2003.
99 Gabriel Khan, “Kaante': New Thorn for Pepsi”, Financial Express, August 31, 2002.
100 Mathew Bender.
101 Press article by Manjushree Naik, Blitz magazine November 14,1999.
102 Gurbir Singh, "Yaadein earns jackpot even before release", Economic Times, July 21, 2001.
103 In film advertising an instant hit”, Economic Times, October 4, 2002.
104 Supra no. 98.
105 “In film advertising an instant hit”, Economic Times, October 4, 2002.
106 Sumit Bhattacharya, "Indiatimes and Archies to market Lagaan merchandise", Economic Times, July 26, 2001.
107 www.supnik.com (As visited on April 1,2002).
108 www.wga.com (As visited in June 2001).
109 www.sag.com (As visited in June 2001).
110 Supra no. 61.
111 Motion picture production and distribution: www.supnik.com (As visited on April 1,2002).
112 Approx. 5.5%-6% of the budget of the film.
113 'Insurance makes debut in Bollywood': Hindustan Times, February 18, 1999, New Delhi.
114 Nandini Raghevendra, "Insurance Companies swing to a Taal", January 14, 2001.
115 United India on 1 crore roll.
116 Anusha Subramanian, "US firms venture to offer film completion guarantee services", Business Standard, March 18, 2002.

 

IV. IMPACT OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY

117 “How Digital Cinema Works”, http://www.howstuffworks.com/digital-cinema.htm (As visited in January 30, 2003).
118 Richard Brandt, President of Trans-Lux Theaters, as quoted in “Digital Projection: Coming Soon?” http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,39652,00.html. (As visited in January 2003).
119 http://www.thomas-edison.info/thomas-edison/ (As visited in January, 2003).
120 “Digital media distribution opportunities for the film industry”, http://www.microsoft.com/windosmedia/content_provider/film/disopwhitepaper.asp. (As visited in January 2003).
121 Supra no.117.
122 “Attack of the Digital Movie”, http://www.abcnews.com. (As visited in January, 2003)
123 Supra no.117.
124 “The Advent of Digital Film”, http://www.highdef.org/Digital_Film.htm. (As visited in January, 2003).
125 http://www.real-image.com/video/corpnews/110001.asp. (As visited in January 2003).
126 “Will Digital Cinema drive Celluloid into obsolescence?” http://www.indiainfoline.com/lyas/nevi/widi.shtml (As visited in January 2003).
127 Ibid.
128 Supra no.122.
129 “Attack of the Digital Movie”. http://www.forbes.com/2002/03/18/0318digitadistribution.html. (As visited in January 2003).
130 Supra no.117.
131 “Real Image Unveils Digital Cinema!”, http://www.real-image.com/video/corpnews/110001.asp ( As visited in January 2003).
132 “The impact of the e- (r) evolution on the distribution of movies”, http://www.indiainfoline.com/lyas/nevi/thim.shtml (As visited in January 2003).
133 Supra no.122.
134 Ibid.
135 “Advent of the Digital Movie”, http://www.forbes.com/2002/03/18/0318digitaldistribution.html. (As visited in January 2003).
136 “Key uncertainties/Constraints”, http://www.thedigitalhub.com/thedigitalhub/digitalmedia/keyuncert&cons.html. (As visited in January 2003)
137 “The Digital revolution”, http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/mp/2002/10/03/stories/2002100300270100.htm. (As visited in January 2003)
138 http://www.mpaa.org/anti-piracy/ (As visited in January 2003).
139 On January 7, 2003 the Norwegian teenager who developed and posted the program when he was 15 was acquitted in a key test case where he was accused of violating computer break-in laws with his program that circumvents security codes on Hollywood's DVD movies.
140 Supra no.117.
141 “Indian cinema's digital baby heads from lab to Locarno”, The Times of India, July 9, 2002.
142 Supra no. 132.
143 http://www.indianmultiplex.com/ (As visited in January, 2003).
144 Supra no.126.
145 Supra no.131.

 

V. ANALYSING THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT

146 Preamble of the Cinematograph Act, 1952.
147 As per Section 2(dd) of the Cinematograph Act, a "film" means a cinematograph film. As per Section 2(c) of the Act, 'cinematograph' includes any apparatus for the representation of moving pictures or series of pictures.
148 Section 3 of the Cinematograph Act.
149 Section 4 of the Cinematograph Act.
150 Under Section 5B of the Cinematograph Act, the Censor Board may not certify the whole or any part of the film if it (i) is against the interests of the sovereignty/integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States,public order, decency or morality; (ii) involves defamation or contempt of court or (iii) is likely to incite the commission of an offence.
151 Rule 26 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983.
152 Section 5C of the Cinematograph Act.
153 Section 33 of the Cinematograph Act.
154 Section 5E of the Cinematograph Act
155 Section 7 and 14 of the Cinematograph Act.
156 Section 7 of the Cinematograph Act
157 Section 7 of the Cinematograph Act.
158 “Imperilling the Prestige of the White Woman Colonial Anxiety” By P. Arora in Visual Anthropology Review and Film Censorship in British India. Vol. II No. 2 Fall 1995, pp.36-50. and Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change. By K. Moti Gokulsing and Wimal Dissanayake. Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books (1998)
159 http://nfdcindia.com/censorboard.htm (As visited on March 25, 2002).
160 K. A. Abbas vs. The Union of India, AIR 1971 SC 481.
161 Pursuant to a major survey which showed that most adults believe they should be allowed to make up their minds about what they watch.; "Snip the scissor-happy censors", Times of India, January 1, 2001.
162 “India's National Film Policy” By M. Pendakur in A Moran (Ed.) Film Policy. London: Routledge.
163 Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957
164 Sections 22 to 27 of the Copyright Act.
165 Sections 22 to 27 of the Copyright Act.
166 Section 2 of the Copyright Act.
167 Section 17(c) of the Copyright Act.
168 Section 17(b) of the Copyright Act.
169 Section 14 of the Copyright Act.
170 Sections 18 and 19 of the Copyright Act.
171 Sections 30 and 30A of the Copyright Act.
172 Section 14(a)(iv) of the Copyright Act.
173 As per Section 17(c) of the Copyright Act, the copyright in the literary and musical work would vest in the employer, i.e.the producer.
174 Section 5! of the Copyright Act.
175 Section 52(j) of the Copyright Act.
176 “Indian Composer sues rapper Dr. Dre”, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/2383847.htm.
177 “Happy Lahiri”, Mid-Day, February 6, 2003.
178 Section 55 of the Copyright Act states that the owner of Copyrights is entitled to all such remedies by way of injunction, damages, accounts and otherwise.
179 Section 63 of the Copyright Act punishes infringement actions with imprisonment of three years with a minimum imprisonment of six months and a fine upto Rs. 200,000 with a minimum fine of Rs. 50,000. Section 63A of the Copyright Act states that in case of second and subsequent convictions the enhanced penalty shall be imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to three years and a fine upto Rs. 200,000 with a minimum fine of Rs. 100,000.
180 Section 2(q) of the Copyright Act.
181 Section 38(2) of the Copyright Act.
182 Section 38(4) of the Copyright Act.
183 Section 38(3) of the Copyright Act.
184 Ibid
185 Sections 33 to 36A of the Copyright Act.
186 A synchronization or "synch" right involves the use of a recording of musical work in audio-visual form: for example as part of a motion picture, television program, commercial announcement, music video or other videotape. Often, the music is "synchronized" or recorded in timed relation with the visual images. Synchronization rights are licensed by the music publisher to the producer of the movie or program, http://www.ascap.com/licensing/termsdefined.html (As visited in January, 2003).
187 Nearly all Composers, Songwriters & Publishers of Musical Works are Members of IPRS. These members amongst them control nearly 97% of the total Indian Music. Thus, IPRS controls a wide repertoire of Indian Musical Works and Foreign Musical Works belonging to other Societies. http://www.indiavibes.com/iprs/members.htm (As visited in January, 2003).
188 Section 2(v) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 defines trade mark as follows: (v) "trade mark" means- (i) in relation to Chapter X (other than section 81), a registered trade mark or a mark used in relation to goods for the purpose of indicating or so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the goods and some person having the right as proprietor to use the mark; and (ii) in relation to the other provisions of this Act, a mark used or proposed to be used in relation to goods for the purpose of indicating or so as to indicate a connection in course of trade between the goods and some person having the right, either as proprietor or as registered user, to use the mark whether with or without any indication of the identity of that person, and includes a certification trade mark registered as such under the provisions of Chapter VIII;
189 Article 19(1 )(a) of the Constitution of India, 1950.
190 http://nfdcindia.com/censorboard.htm (As visited on March 25,2002).
191 Article 19(2) of the Constitution of India.
192 A defamatory statement is a statement that is calculated to expose a person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or to injure him in his trade, business, profession, calling or office, or to cause him to be shunned or avoided in society.
193 Law of Torts, Ratanlaland Dhirajlal (1997), 23rd Edition, at p. 234.
194 Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code.
195 Section499and500ofthelndian Penal Code.
196 Section 501 and502 of the Indian Penal Code.
197 Section 2(c) of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986.
198 Section 4(c) of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act.
199 As per Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, offences are made punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term extending to two years and fine extending to Rs. 20,000 on first conviction. Second and subsequent convictions attract higher punishments.
200 Section 2(c)(xvii) of the IDBI Act.
201 http://www.indiaabroadonline.com/cinema/mav2001/rbi.shtml (As visited in May, 2001).
202 Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or issue of Security by a Person Resident outside India) Regulations, 2000, Annexure B, Item 8.
203 Press Note2 (2002) Series issued by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
204 Importer includes Non-Resident Indians, Foreign parties and private Indian parties.
205 Article 1, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution.
206 Mark Litwak, "Dealmaking in the Film and Television Industry" (1994) at p. 264.
207 Recording Industry Association of America; www.riaa.com (As visited in June 2001).
208 Mark Litwak, "Dealmaking in the Film and Television Industry" (1994) at p. 273.
209 Motion picture production & distribution: www.supnik.com (As visited in June 2001).
210 http://www.mpaa.org/movieratings/ (As visited on May 7, 2002).
211 http://www.natoonline.org/ratingsabout.htm (As visited on May 7, 2002).
212 Mark Litwak, "Self Defence for Film Makers" at http://www.marklitwak.com/selfdef.htm#_ednref4 (As visited on April 1,2002).
213 Supra no. 182
214 Ibid.
215 112 Cal. App. 285, 297 p. 91 (1931).
216 Mark Litwak, "Dealmaking in the Film and Television Industry" (1994) at p. 289.
217 464 F. Supp. 426 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).
218 K Ramaswamy and G.B Patnaik JJ, of the Supreme Court in State of Andhra Pradesh v. Nagoti Venkatramana, while commenting upon the 1984 amendments in the Copyright Act.
219 http://www.iipa.com/aboutiipa.html (As visited in January, 2003).
220 Section 62 of the Copyright Act.
221 Section 70 of the Copyright Act.
222 “The 2002 Special 301 Country Report” International Intellectual Property Alliance, http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2002/2002SPEC301INDIA.pdf.
223 "Piracy Lays siege on the box office" Economic Times, February 11, 2002.
224 Industry sources.
225 The Indian Entertainment Industry Strategy and Vision, FICCI, March 2000.
226 “Music films launch anti-piracy campaign”, Economic Times, December 25, 2002.
227 C. Lall, "Indian Film Industry and Copyright Laws" (1998).
228 “At Full Speed: Hong Kong Cinema in Borderless World.” By Ester C. M. Yau. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press (2001).
229 Section 2(h) of the Contract Act.
230 Section 2(a) and 2(b) of the Contract Act.
231 Section 23, 24 and 25 of the Contract Act.
232 Section 23 and 24 of the Contract Act.
233 Section 14 of the Contract Act.
234 Section 17 of the Contract Act.
235 Section 15 of the Contract Act.
236 Section 16 of the Contract Act.
237 Section 18 of the Contract Act.
238 Sections 20 and 22 of the Contract Act.
239 Section 21 of the Contract Act.
240 Section 11 of the Contract Act. For example, a minor (below 18 years) may not have the capacity to enter into a film contract.
241 Article 3 and 4 of the Berne Convention; Article 2 and 3 of the Universal Copyright Convention; and Article 3 and 4 of the TRIPS Agreement.
242 For the purposes of Articles 3 and 4 of the TRIPS Agreement, "protection" shall include matters affecting the availability, acquisition, scope, maintenance and enforcement of intellectual property rights as well as those matters affecting the use of intellectual property rights specifically addressed in the TRI PS Agreement.
243 Paul D. Supnik "Copyright Clearance, Protection and Enforcement Outside of the United States" at http://www.supnik.com/ (As visited on April 1, 2002).

 

VI. TAX CONSIDERATIONS

244 Rule 9A and 9B of the Income Tax Rules.
245 The Ernst & Young Guide to International Film Production: An overview of Business Incentives and Tax Matters 2001 Edition.
246 Clause (v) to Explanation 2 to section 9(1 )(vi) of the ITA.
247 The foreign company should not have any shareholders who are Indian citizens or residents.
248 The partnership should not have any Indian partners.
249 The individual should not be a resident or a citizen of India.
250 Section 9(1 )(i)(d) of the ITA
251 CBDT Circular no. 787 dated February 2, 2000.
252 Section 80HHF of the ITA.
253 Section 80IB of the ITA
254 21 CTR24(Bom).
255 57Taxmann13(Bom).
256 10ITD709(Bom).
257 Section 80RR of the ITA.
258 28STC516 (Bom).
259 36 STC 77 (Bom).
260 “Indian Entertainment Industry: The Show goes on & on…”, A Report prepared by FICCI and Arthur Anderson for Frames 2002.
261 Section 65(90) of the Finance Act, 1994.
262 http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/olia/oed/roster/regoin/att-CA.txt (As visited in June 2001.
263 British Film Commission and S J Berwin & Co, "The Sale and Leaseback of British Films" (2001).
264 http://www.dfat.gov.au/australia2000/film australia.html (As visited in June 2001).
265 http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/olia/oed/roster/regoin/att-CA.txt (As visited in June 2001.
266 Ashoke Nag, “Bollywood gets Canadian flavour”, Economic Times, November 22, 2002.

 

VII. CROSSING THE CHASM

267 ”Crisil develops methodology to rate film, TV producers", Business Standard, October 18, 2002
268 Khozem Merchant, “Bollywood seeks a happy ending”. Financial Times, December 31, 2002
269 http://www.rediff.com/entertai/2002/oct/24main.htm. (As visited in January, 2003).
270 Sony Music Hits gold with 'Lagaan', Economic Times, January 14, 2002
271 Shalini Singh, "This story has a twist: The movies are back", Economic Times, August 12, 2000.
272 Ibid.
273 Ibid.
274 For example, the cost for a 300-seater hall would be about Rs. 2.5 crores (Approximately US $500,000).
275 Rekha Dutt, "Take two: single-screen theatre owners threaten to go to court", Times of India, August 16, 2001.
276 "Magical Reelism", Times of India, January 26, 2002.
277 Lalitha Srinivasan, “The Scent of a Superstar, Big B Style”, Financial Express, September 24, 2002
278 "A.R. Rahman joins hands with Michael Jackson", Times of India, August 18,2001.
279 “Happy Lahiri”, Mid-Day, February 6, 2003.
280 "Moulin Rouge: Hollywood Meets Bollywood", www.zooba.com (As visited in June 2001).
281 Patil Vimla," Hindi films earn oodles of dollars", Free Press Journal, November 6, 2000.
282 "Big future seen for Bollywood films", Economic Times, March 22, 2002.
283 Supra no. 252
284Ibid.
285 'Kaante revives Bollywood”, BBC News, January 6, 2003, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/film/2632445.stm
286 http://www.rediff.com/entertai/2003/jan/03kaante.htm. (As visited in January, 2003).
287 Gene Siskel Film Centre director
288 "K3G can help Bollywood make inroads into US: critics", Times of India, January 11, 2002.
289 In theatre collections, in its first week, Lagaan collected US$ 360,000 in US and US $200,000 in the UK; Gurbir Singh,”House Full: Lagaan takes global markets by storm", Economic Times, July 13, 2001.
290 "K3G can help Bollywood make inroads into US: critics", Times of India, January 11, 2002.

 

VIII. IDENTIFYING COLLABORATION OPPORTUNITIES

291 “Can new money create a world-class film industry in India?”, www.Businessweek.com. (As visited in January, 2003).
292 "Global Majors see India as animation hub", Economic Times, June 6,2001
293 Head of Family Entertainment Group (PEG) and consultant to various animation studios in the US. 294 Supra no. 262.
295 Nina Martyria, "Guess who build the sets of Gladiator?", Times of India, September 10, 2000.
296 Anusha Subramanian, "US firms venture to offer film completion guarantee services", Business Standard, March 18, 2002.
297 Gurbir Singh, “Yash Chopra plans a Rs 60 crore dream factory”, Economic Times, December 10, 2002.
298 Managing Director of Film City Studio (the oldest and largest studio in Mumbai).
299 Owns and operates Hallmark Channel.
300 Sibebrata Das, "Hallmarkto make $30-m film in India", Financial Express, August 20, 2001.
301 Sahir Anand, "Hollywood cavorts with Bollywood, dreams big", Economic Times, July 8, 2001.
302 Supra no. 37.

 

IX. AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT

303 http://www.nasscom.org/artdisplay.asp?cat_id=61 accessed on October 8, 2002.
304 See chapter 5, "Collaboration Opportunities", Locations.
305 See chapter 5, "Collaboration Opportunities", Low Labour costs.
306 "Caught in the Act, Bollywood seeks quick release", Economic Times, March 18, 2002.
307 Khozem Merchant, “Bollywood seeks a happy ending”. Financial Times, December 31, 2002.
308 Supra no. 275.
309 Supra no. 276.
310 “NRI accolades for Ghai film institute”, Times of India, March 26, 2002.
311 Sahir Anand, “Hollywood cavorts with Bollywood, dreams big”, Economic Times, July 8, 2001.
312 Supra no. 37.
313 Ibid.
314 Supra no. 261.
315 Amit Khanna, "Copyright Theft: that's not entertainment", EconomicTimes, August 18, 2001.

 

X. CONCLUSION

316 Supra no. 276.
317 “The Road to Bollywood.” By David Chute, Film Comment, May/June 2002, p. 36.